"Mattel's apology should be publicly and vociferously deplored, not simply for the craven act itself, then for its assuredly lasting after-effects upon other foreign firms, who will now find themselves pressured to act similarly, at pain of who knows what sanction."I think that Mattel's decision confused most Americans, and I still wonder if it might open them up to potential legal liability. HOWEVER, I strongly feel they made the right decision, considering the circumstances.
When the story broke, Mattel laid a good share of the blame on Chinese manufacturers, and by default the Chinese government that represents them. Mattel's strategy was to pass negative press on to a logical scape goat. After all, the Chinese government has no share holders, and to this day no one knows the names of the contract factories Mattel was using to make the lead-laden toys. Mattel saw this as a PR issue and passed the problem to an anonymous Chinese system. This is a typical American response to a PR nightmare like this.
However, the massive publicity the story got was an embarrassment to the Chinese. Those of you who are familiar with Asian culture will recognize the importance of saving "face", especially with the 2008 Olympics right around the corner. (The 2008 Olympics are causing face saving headaches for the communists already).
The communists were backed into a PR corner and had no recourse but to penalize Mattel - and perhaps every other Western business operating in China. In a country of inexpensive labor, government officials that turn a blind-eye to labor laws and no government inspectors to insure the quality of manufactured goods, Western manufacturers operating in China had a LOT to potentially lose. My guess is that other manufacturers got to Mattel before the Chinese government had to formalize a response, their message being: "Don't rock the boat!"
No comments:
Post a Comment